This week we start to take a look at the various ways in which the government, or particular politicians or organizations try to influence or shape the media. This discussion will start with regulations. Some people view government regulations, in general, as an infringement into our lives and the lives of private companies. Others see regulations as the government actively safeguarding the people and helping society.
When we think about media regulation in particular, some think that popular media (and potentially the news media) should be regulated in order to keep it decent, safe, and fair. Another side of the debate focuses on the freedom of the press, a founding principle of American democracy, and often argues that regulation of other forms of media amount to censorship and unnecessary government infringement. The primary agency in charge of regulating the media is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and you can check out their website and all that they do here.
I am interested in a wide ranging conversation on the topic of government regulation of the media, directed both at news media and broader entertainment media. In order to get the conversation started I'll pose the basic questions below:
- How would increasing or decreasing the regulations on news media help or hurt democracy or democratic discourse in America?
- Should the government regulate popular entertainment media? If no, why not? If yes, what standards should they use.
